This month witnessed the death of two 93 year old former rulers. The one who got a lot of press was of course Ronald Reagan. The one who got almost no press, even in his home country of Thailand, was Field Marshal Thanom Kittikachorn.
Thanom ruled Thailand from 1963-1973 more or less as a military dictator. His reign ended with a popular revolt against his power and he was forced to flee the country. He returned from exile in 1976, sparking a student revolution at Thammasat University which ended in a bloody massacre. (I have written a little bit about this event before.)
The interesting thing to me about these two deaths are not the deaths themselves, but the way that the people in their respective countries treated the death. Granted, one was (for the most part) well-respected in many ways. Even if people didn't like Reagan's policies, at least they could agree that he was an excellent communicator and leader.
Thanom, on the other hand, was not well-liked, as is the case with most military dictators. But in the wake of his death, Thai people refuse to talk about him or his legacy. Here are actual quotes from the Nation (one of Bangkok's English language newspapers):
One of the most prominent student leaders of those days, who asked not to be named, said "the incident occurred decades ago" and that he did not wish to talk about it.
Another former student leader told his aide, when contacted by The Nation, that he didn't know if there was anything to be said on the issue...
An activist who led an attempt to collect information about the October 6, 1976 massacre and wishes to remain anonymous, said this about Thanom: "If I say anything, it won't be polite. Do you think you can be polite [in talking] about someone who ordered the killing of pro-democracy protesters? As a human being, could you be polite about it?"
Saowanee Limmanond, another former student leader, said that although she didn't want to say anything, it was time to put bitterness behind and forgive the former dictator.
Sombat Tamrongthanyawong, former secretary-general of the National Student Centre in 1973, also said he didn't want to say anything because Thanom is now dead.
"Let us put the issue to rest," he said.
What?! Ok, so I can appreicate Thai people wanting to be polite and respectful, but how can people learn the mistakes of the past if they are never discussed? How does one understand the present or plan for the future without knowing what happened in the past?
Another quote from the Nation was this one:
"My feeling is just that he's dead now. We leave the rest to be a matter of political history� I just want people today to learn from the past. People today are not informed about the history of the October 14, 1973 struggle� I don't know how long it will take before history will be properly recorded...
How long will it take before history is properly recorded? About as long as it takes for people to tell the truth about their feelings and their experiences, even if those feelings and experiences are negative ones.
The quotes above were taken from: Uprising leaders stay silent
For more information on Field Marhal Thanom, see these two articles:
THANOM KITTIKACHORN: 1911-2004: Democracy�s bitterest foe
Thais recall life under totalitarian leadership